Andhra Land Grab? Pawan Kalyan Accuses Jagan Reddy Government of Rs. 35,141 Crore Housing Scam in Letter to PM Modi
A political firestorm has erupted in Andhra Pradesh following Jana Sena party chief Pawan Kalyan's explosive accusation against the YSRCP government led by Chief Minister Jagan Mohan Reddy. In a five-page letter addressed to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Kalyan alleges a massive Rs. 35,141 crore scam in the state's flagship housing scheme for the poor.
The Heart of the Matter:
The housing scheme, YSR Jagananna Colony, aims to construct 30 lakh houses for economically backward families. Kalyan's letter, however, paints a bleak picture, alleging widespread irregularities and corruption in the scheme's implementation. He accuses the government of:
- Land Acquisition Scam: Artificially inflating land value and paying a pittance to farmers, pocketing the difference; a ruling party legislator reportedly sought an investigation into this.
- Inconsistent Data: Discrepancies in the number of house sites distributed, land acquired, and funds spent, casting doubt on transparency and accountability.
- Incomplete Construction: Despite claims of constructing 30 lakh houses, only 17,005 housing colonies are reportedly nearing completion, leaving beneficiaries in the lurch.
Kalyan's Plea to PM Modi:
The Jana Sena chief appeals to PM Modi to intervene and institute a probe by central agencies like the CBI or ED. He calls for a thorough investigation into the alleged scam, recovery of misappropriated funds, and punishment for the guilty.
Government Rubbishes Charges:
The YSRCP government has vehemently denied the accusations, calling them "baseless and politically motivated." They counter that the housing scheme is progressing seamlessly, with over 28 lakh houses already sanctioned and construction in full swing.
A Controversy with Broader Implications:
This isn't just a political slugfest; it raises vital questions about transparency, accountability, and social welfare initiatives. If Kalyan's claims hold any truth, it would expose a severe breach of trust towards the state's most vulnerable communities.
No comments