Pictures in ASI Report of Gyanvapi Mosque Show 'Shivling' and Broken Idols, Reigniting Controversy

The Archaeological Survey of India's (ASI) survey report of the Gyanvapi mosque in Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, has stirred fresh controversy after leaked photos purportedly show fragments of Hindu deities and inscriptions within the mosque complex.

Images in the Report:

• 'Shivling' Found: One of the most disputed findings is a photograph showing a partially submerged object resembling a 'shivling,' a cylindrical structure representing the Hindu deity Shiva. However, the ASI report itself does not definitively claim it to be a shivling, stating it is "a partially damaged octagonal object made of black stone."
• Broken Idols: The report also includes pictures of fragmented statues identified as Hindu deities like Ganesha, Hanuman, and Nandi. These broken idols were reportedly found within the mosque premises and its courtyard.
• Inscriptions: The report mentions an inscription engraved on a stone recording the construction of the mosque in 1676-77 CE. It also states that the mosque underwent repairs in 1792-93 CE. A photograph of this inscription from the ASI records exists, dating back to 1965-66.

Controversy and Legal Battle:

The presence of these purported Hindu symbols within the mosque has reignited the decades-old dispute over the ownership of the structure. Hindu petitioners claim the mosque was built over a demolished temple dedicated to Shiva, while Muslim groups maintain it has been a place of worship for centuries.

The leaked photos have fueled arguments on both sides, with Hindu groups using them as evidence of their claims and Muslim groups raising concerns about the authenticity and context of the findings.

The Gyanvapi mosque case is currently under judicial consideration, with the Varanasi court recently ordering the videographic survey of the mosque's inner and outer walls. The leaked photos from the ASI report are likely to play a significant role in the ongoing legal battle.

Importance of the Findings:

While the ASI report itself avoids making definitive pronouncements, the presence of these images adds another layer of complexity to the already sensitive issue. It is crucial to remember that these are just preliminary findings, and a thorough investigation and analysis are required before drawing any conclusive statements.

The case highlights the need for a nuanced and objective approach to understanding contested historical narratives and addressing sensitive religious disputes. It is important to ensure a fair and transparent judicial process that respects the rights and beliefs of all communities involved.